by Ed Skinner

Conventional Pistol, a.k.a. "Bullseye", is a high precision pistol competition sanctioned by the National Rifle Association.
 
This publication is © Copyright 2004-2008 by Ed Skinner.
All rights are reserved.

Saturday, June 18, 2005

Ordered 1,000 Reloads of 45 ACP

I sent 1,000 empty pieces of 45 ACP brass to Neil at NSK Sales along with a check for $155.35 to reload them as "wad" (Bullseye) ammunition. My total cost per round will be at $0.16 per round after adding in the postage for the empty brass. (The check consisted of $121.25 for the reloads and $34.10 for the return shipping.) The cheapest ammunition I had been able to find is the 100 round white box of Remington from Walmart and, at $19.95 (plus tax), that ammunition works out to be $0.22 per round. Neil's reloads are seven cents a round cheaper.

The next notch on the "cheaper ammunition" ladder is doing my own reloading but that has a relatively high startup cost. Although I could probably start reloading for about $200.00 and at a cost of about $0.08 per round, all the Bullseye shooters say I will tire of the single-stage reloader (at that cost) pretty fast. Almost universally, they recommend one of the progressive presses from Dillon, especially the 550B which sells at Sportsman's Warehouse for $319.00 (plus tax). If I then add a few of the "this and thats" that are bound to be needed, and then roll in some consumables (powder, primers and bullets), the up-front cost of reloading with something I'll use for a long time is more like $500 -- and that's just too much for now.

I'll probably buy reloads from Neil a couple of times before getting into the reloading game.

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Science-Up the Wobble

It is a fairly common belief that if the wobble measures 1" at the muzzle, it will measure about that same size on the target. Sounds reasonable, right?

But try this experiment. Hold your arm out as if you were aiming at the target and then swing it so it's pointing down at a 45 degree angle. The tip of your finger is now about two feet below the center of the target but, I'm sure you can see, if your finger were a gun and you shot right now, the bullet is going into the ground, and a whole lot closer than two feet below the center of the target.

That's because this belief that 1" of wobble means 1" of error in the target just plain isn't true. It's a myth, a nice one, but still a myth.

In reality, your arm pivots around a point in the shoulder. That point is fixed and, as your arm moves around, the gun is not always pointed at the target. (Remember the 45 degree down experiment?)

Any displacement away from the perfect sight picture of sights and target in perfect alignment actually describes a triangle with a narrow angle at the shooter's shoulder. The bigger the motion, the bigger the angle and the bigger the error. And that error is "angular" so that, as the target is moved farther and farther away, even though the angle may not change, the error (distance away from target center to which the bullet will fly) grows larger, and in direct proportion to the distance.

Fortunately, we don't need trigonometry to figure out how much wobble results in how big a spread at the target. A simple ratio will do.

Indeed, I figured it out (below) for 50 yard Slow Fire, my primary nemesis. Here's what I did.

I wanted to know how small does my wobble have to be to get a scoring shot. (We'll worry about the X-ring later. The procedure is the same. Let's just get something that scores, first.)

Ok, the largest ring on the B-6 NRA 50 yard Slow Fire target is the 5-ring. According to the NRA, it measures 19.68 inches in diameter.

To illustrate how the ratio is going to work, let's first consider the case where the target is placed right at the muzzle, paper touching gun. Obviously, the wobble can be as large as 19.68 inches in diameter and we will still have a scoring hit if we pull the trigger (and the blast doesn't shred or ignite the target).

Notice in this first case that the target is roughly 30" away from the pivot of the shoulder. Arm length varies, of course. Mine is 31-32" from shoulder to front sight, depending on which gun I'm holding. We'll use 30" here because it probably fits some shooters, and also because, frankly, the numbers will be easier to do.

Ok, let's move the target out to double that distance, to 60" from the shoulder, or 30" from the muzzle if you'd rather measure it there.

Now how big a wobble can be tolerated and still have a shot that lands in the five ring or better?

Since the target is now 60" away, the ratio of arm length to target distance (30/60) times the size of the 5 ring (19.68") tells us the muzzle can move 9.84", centered on the bull, and still result a scoring hole.

At four times the distance (120"), the wobble is 0.25 times (30/120) the 5 ring size, or slightly less than five inches.

What about at 50 yards? Well, 50 yards is 1800 inches and continuing with the 30" arm measurement, the ratio of 30/1800 -- let's see, drop the 0 and we have 3/180, so divide the 180 by 3 and we have reduced the fraction to 1/60, so 1/60th of 19.68 inches is 0.328 inches (almost exactly 5/16" [0.3125"] which is the size of the hole in the 3-hole notebook paper I have in my loose leaf notebook).

So far, so good.

Unfortunately, my gun has a "wobble" of its own. That is, from shot to shot, the bullets don't always land in the same place because of inaccuracies in the gun itself.

My Springfield Armory Mil-Spec, off the shelf, was measured on a Ransom Rest to have about a 6" spread at 50 yards.

How much is that at the muzzle? It's 1/60th of 6" or about 1/10". (Boy, that sounds like a lot!)

What this really means is that in order for me to keep all my shots within the five ring, I need to be able to hold, centered on the bull, with a wobble of slightly less than 1/4" (0.328" - 0.100" = 0.228", or very close to the hole made by a 7/32" drill [0.21875" without wobble!]).

But let's keep this easy. Let's use the 1/4" measurement because it's "close enough" and easy to work with.

Drawing a 1/4" diameter circle on a post-it note and sticking that to the wall, I can point my outstretched arm and finger at it, point-blank range, and see that *most* of the time, my wobble really is inside that circle. If I were holding my Springfield Armory 1911 and able to release the shot without disturbing anything (hah!), I'd almost certainly have a scoring hit, 5-ring or better (wind, ammunition, lock-up and all sorts of other factors permitting, of course).

But to be completely honest, when my finger is pointed at the circle on the Post-It note, I occasionally lurch outside the circle or my attention drifts and so does my point of aim. And to make matters worse, I still jerk the gun when releasing shots far more often than I'd like to admit. So, for me, that 1/4" of motion at the tip of the gun is a goal toward which I'm working, but not a reality I can repeat on every shot.

For those who aspire to High Master status, here are the numbers of interest. The "X" ring is 1.695" in diameter. Assuming a gun that shoots sub 1" groups at 50 yards (which is quite a feat in itself), the shooter's wobble must be within a 0.02825" circle, just a little bit smaller than 1/32" (0.03125).

Have you ever watched the tip of the muzzle when a High Master is shooting? I have, and the stillness they can achieve is truly astonishing. You're looking at a wobble of less than 1/32" all the way out at the end of the High Master's arm, at the tip of the muzzle. Amazing!

Does that mean that when I score an "X" that I've held the gun to 1/32" and released the shot?

Hah, don't I wish!

Far more likely is that the error from the wobble at the instant of release was added to the gun's error on that shot, and that when those two errors were combined with my jerk and lurch, well, I just got lucky.

But it is also true that as my trigger control improves and my wobble shrinks and the lurches become less and less frequent, the probability of punching out the "X" does improve.

Finally, it's worth asking when should I have a competition grade barrel fitted to my factory Springfield Armory Mil-Spec?

Well, if the gun has a 6" group at 50 yards, my gut-feel is that when my ability is penalized more than 25% because of the gun, then it's time to get it fixed. Roughly speaking, that means that when my shots are consistently within the 6 ring or better, it's time to fix the gun.

Do I believe these numbers? Do they sound credible? Do they match my experience?

Yes.

When my arm is rock steady and I release a shot well, it scores. But when my arm lurches and the shot goes, it's not even in the paper. And similarly, when I jerk or heel or milk the gun while releasing the shot, it's "Hello paster!"

At the next competition, try this. When you finish your slow fire, put your gun down, take a couple of steps back and pick out the best shooter there and watch the tip of his/her gun against some distant object while they release the shot. For some of the shooters I've watched like this, the wobble is imperceptable -- I couldn't see any movement at all from where I was standing. That doesn't mean they have no wobble, but just that it is very, very hard to see.

After all, how far away can you see 1/32" of motion?

Monday, June 6, 2005

Accidental Discharge

(Posted to Bullseye-L.)

It's worth mentioning an "oops" (Accidental Discharge) I had while doing the Ball and Dummy drill in the hope that someone else may avoid doing likewise.

I loaded five live and two dummy 45 caliber rounds in random order into a magazine, readied the magazine and proceeded to fire.

After one of the dummy rounds, I pulled open the slide with my hand over the ejection port to catch the dummy round and then (somewhat clumsily) released the slide to chamber the next mystery round. This usually works but, for whatever reason, the next round didn't fully chamber and, looking at the back of the gun, I could see the slide had not gone completely forward.

Having done something similar with my S&W 41, I knew better than to push forward on the slide. (The extractor [I erroneously wrote "ejector" in my original posting] crushes the edge of the 22 caliber rimfire cartridge and, BANG!)

Instead, I removed the magazine and carefully pulled the slide open to inspect the chamber. Sure enough, a 45 round was sitting in the chamber and, somehow, the extractor had not engaged it.

At this point I *SHOULD HAVE* locked the slide open, and then tilted the gun and shaken it to remove the live round. (Or is there a better way?)

But I didn't. Instead, I did the wrong thing and released the slide and, BANG!

Before you ask, Yes, I was following safety rule #1 and had the muzzle pointed down range. Thank you everyone else for presenting such good examples. That's a sincere "thank you".

My ignorant (tired?) mind was presuming the extractor would "snap over" the rim and I'd then be able to fire that round. But instead, when I released the slide, the extractor crushed the side of the round's base which, in turn, crushed the primer and set it off.

When the round fired, the slide was apparently not completely closed because, when I inspected the brass afterward, the case was puffed backward around the deformed base and primer. I was lucky it hadn't split and let loose in my direction.

Moral of the story: Open the slide fully to eject the dummy round and lock the slide open. Then, close the slide in the same manner you would as if you'd just inserted the magazine.

Here's the sequence I had demonstrated to do that: Right thumb on hammer under the locked open slide, left thumb on grip safety, left forefinger depresses the trigger, move left thumb releases slide and round is loaded into the chamber, move left thumb in front of hammer, right thumb releases hammer and you find out if the hammer has been released or not, remove left forefinger from trigger and if necessary, recock the hammer and release the hammer and, finally, assuming the hammer is not pressing on it, remove the left thumb from in front of the trigger. The gun is ready to fire. Sounds complicated but with a little practice, the "dance steps" become automatic.

Addendum

It was the opinion of several respondents, some of whom are accomplished gunsmiths, that the gun did not fire as a result of the extractor crushing the case as I had theorized. Speculations included a stuck firing pin and other ideas but, after the fact, there was no way to tell for sure.

I had the gun checked (before cleaning) but the gunsmith found nothing amiss. The actual cause of the gun firing will, therefore, remain a mystery.

But it is clear that dropping the slide on a chambered round is a very bad idea. I won't do that again!

Struggling with the 45

(Posted to Bullseye-L.)

I'm really struggling with the 45.

Any tips on ridding myself of flinch and anticipation? (I occasionally catch myself closing my eyes now, too. Argh!)

Here's how I'm practicing to try and overcome these reactions.

  1. I'm dry-firing to not only get the feel of the trigger, but also to have a "mental playback" to use when live firing to "set my expectations." (When the "playback" works, the live shot is released same as in dry fire and it surprises me -- exactly the desired effect.)
  2. I'm using ball and dummy drills (five live rounds randomly mixed with two dummies) to test myself by making the flinch and anticipation obvious when those dummy rounds come up unexpectantly. (Live fire masks the jerks but when the dummy round comes up, any movement is obvious.)
  3. And sometimes I put up the target backwards and just release shots to try and anneal myself to the physical effects of the bullet taking flight.

Overcoming the natural reaction to that big explosion so close by is difficult -- it seems to be more a matter of learning to ignore the bang, of being indifferent to its presence, of "letting go" rather than "holding against". [Does that make sense?]

Any other suggestions or just "Keep at it"?

About Me

Blog Archive

© Copyright 2004-2008 by Ed Skinner, All Rights Reserved.