by Ed Skinner

Conventional Pistol, a.k.a. "Bullseye", is a high precision pistol competition sanctioned by the National Rifle Association.
 
This publication is © Copyright 2004-2008 by Ed Skinner.
All rights are reserved.

Thursday, October 12, 2006

Feel the Wiggle

For what it may be worth, I learned something unexpected in dry-fire. Whether or not I need to keep that lesson or if it was just a stepping stone along the way, I don't know.

Regardless, here it is.

In dry-fire, I noticed there is a small amount of lateral play in the triggers on my 1911s. And in trying 1911s that belong to others, I also noticed it in theirs as well. I presume it is present in all 1911s, to greater or lesser degree it is true, but it seems to always be there.

I'm only talking a fraction of a millimeter but to the sensitive finger-tip, it's very definately there. I can feel it.

Part of my trigger preparation now is to "feel" for that left-to-right movement and to position the trigger in the middle of it.

What I think is happening is that, inside the gun's frame, the harp of the trigger is "floating" -- it is not touching the frame or magazine on either side. Instead, the trigger is, if you will, "standing" on the sear. There is no other contact inside the frame.

The release I subsequently get is far more likely to be straighter back than if I just feel for where the trigger and finger come into contact. Don't misunderstand. I still have to get trigger and finger in the exact same contact but I then also do the lateral wobble to feel the movement and finally place the trigger right in the middle of that space. The trigger feels like it is balanced on a point deep inside the gun.

I mentioned this to John Zurek but he looked at me like I was nuts. (Well, maybe I am.) John might have said something like, "You're gettin' way too analytical, Ed."

Well, there is certainly some truth to that. It is an occupational hazard, and my wife would certainly say it annoys her to no end sometimes.

Yeah, I'm an analytical kind of guy. Guilty as charged.

But whether it is too analytical or not, I don't care because, frankly, it works!

I am suddenly (well, not so suddenly -- it's been a looong time coming) getting some really nice releases and a much improved "score" on calling those shots. The holes in the target are right where I saw them, dead on and my Slow Fire is up 10+ points.

Unfortunately, Timed and Rapid Fire, especially Rapid, start good but then I fall into old habits. The first shot or two are straight back and hit the target very nicely, but then the rhythm-monster takes over inside my head and my whole body spasms to yank the shots off "in tempo". I'm also a musician and, boy, can I keep a steady beat. But in Rapid Fire, I don't consistently follow through, don't get the sights back on the target, but the "beat" is there and the gun fires precisely on the beat, forget the target thank you very much.

And most noticeably, there's always this same circular motion that starts as the gun comes down out of recoil and enters the black. At that point, something takes over and the gun takes off to the right, moves out of the black, neatly circles down and completely around the black, and the shot goes when the aim point reaches jerk land sometimes with an extra jerk in there just to show me who's really in control here.

"Oh no, it's the jerk," I could almost scream.

The monster is in control and, oh yeah, the holes are gonna be down and left.

"Ragged Fire" is going to take time.

But getting that trigger under control in Slow Fire, in finding a mantra that enables me to move that trigger straight back, well, it's a major revelation!

Is this something good shooters have to think of? Almost certainly not. Most shooters, I'm just about convinced, learn by watching and doing. As infants, we learn how to learn by observation. Let a child see a step-stool in use and they'll soon be climbing the furniture and onto the counter. Most things in life we learn by watching and most of the things I've learned about shooting, I've learned by watching others.

Is this something good shooters have to do but aren't necessarily aware that they're doing it? Again, the answer is probably no. What is essential seems to be moving the trigger straight back. If you can do that with the harp pressed up against the inside of the frame, that's fine. What matters is the hole in the target.

But is this something I needed to discover so I could find a way (not necessarily the only way) of getting a clean release?

To that, my answer is an emphatic, "Yes!"

It was the step that moved me through a tough road block.

For the next several weeks (and years?) I'll be in the process of cementing that lesson into place in head and body. Repetition is the way that's done. I'll write it up for my Shot Plan and tape it into my gun box. I'll read it often and mentally say the steps to myself many, many times.

  • "Okay, raise the gun so the sights are just above the bull.
  • "Find the dot. See the dot. Focus on the dot.
  • "Now, place the finger carefully on the trigger right there on the pad of my finger, and right there on the trigger.
  • "Put on a slight pressure so you feel the contact with the trigger more on the lower part of the finger rather than the upper.
  • "Next, gently move the trigger left and right. Do you feel the free space? Move it again if you don't. You've got to find it. [Put the gun down and start over if you can't find the free space.]
  • "Okay, position the trigger right in the middle of the space and add a tiny bit of pressure to keep it there.
  • "Come down into the bull and into the aim point.
  • "Let the wobble happen -- it will diminish and when it does, my unconscious mind will move the trigger straight back through that free space and the shot will go straight to the target.
  • "Okay, stay on the dot, ... the dot ... the dot ... ohmmmmmmmmmmmmmm... Bang!"

With repetition, that straight back movement will eventually dominate what's happening in Timed and Rapid Fire. It will come.

Ultimately, the evil "jerk" will be banished.

His days are numbered.

Hooray!

Tuesday, October 3, 2006

Deactivating Primers?

After loading several hundred rounds of ammunition not too long ago, I then discovered that two primers had been seated sideways and one upside down. I removed the bullets and recovered the powder but decided to discard the shells with their damaged primers.

But since the primers were still live, I wondered what should I do to deactivate them?

I was a bit surprised when several individuals I consulted basically said it can't be done: you can't deactivate primers.

"Surely this cannot be," I thought. "What do Winchester, CCI and Federal do if they mess up a batch? Surely they have a way to render the material harmless?"

Doubting Thomas that I am, I decided to do some research.

Web searches turned up authoritative and lay answers in three categories: oil, water and "it can't be done."

Both RCBS and Dillon who manufacture ammunition reloading equipment state, in their instruction and/or on-line help files, that damaged primers should be soaked in oil or, similarly, that contact with oil will deactivate primers.

For example, Dillon says (at http://www.dillonhelp.com/rl550benglish/safety.htm), "If a primer should become lodged in a primer magazine or pick-up tube, deactivate the primers that are in the tube. Do this by filling the tube with oil, WD-40 or CRC lubricating solution."

And RCBS, in describing how to lubricate one of their presses warns (at http://www.rcbs.com/downloads/instructions/ TurretPressInstructions.pdf), "Care should be taken not to apply oil where it could come in contact with primer pockets or primers. Oil will deactivate primers."

One lay shooter reported (at http://www.handloads.com/forum/showthread.asp?topic=2&thread=2491) that, after a short soak in various oil-based substances (incl. Hoppes #9 and WD-40), his primers would all still go "Bang!"

At a different web site (http://www.predatormastersforum.com/ killprimers.shtml), methodical experiments were conducted. The experimenter found that, even when soaked in water or oil, some brands of primers will re-activate once they've dried out.

"Ok," I said to myself, "let's go straight to the horse's mouth. Let's ask Winchester, CCI and Federal, all of whom make primers."

I visited their websites, found the place to submit a question and asked each one the same question, "How can I safely deactivate primers?"

Federal responded:

> RE: Ammo Inquiry from Federal Web Site
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:20:39 -0500
> From: "Prodserv" 
> To: "Ed Skinner" 
>
> Soak them in penetrating oil.

Winchester, after a couple of phone calls, responded by telephone:

"Soak them in oil for a couple of days."

And Linda at CCI responded by email:

> I suggest taking them to your local HAZMAT folks for
> disposal. The regulations for 'proper' disposal may
> vary, depending on where you live.

Good idea!

I Googled-up the state of Arizona web pages and, therein, found the government department in charge of hazardous material regulations. In two minutes I had them on the phone.

"Uhm, that's not on our list. Try the Police Department."

The Police connected me to the bomb squad -- am I now on their "Watch" list? -- who, after considerable discussion amongst themselves (several of whom were reloaders) said if the quantity was small, I should soak them in water and then put them in the trash. I could swear there were heads nodding in the background as they added, by the time the primers dry-out and re-activate, they should be safely buried at the city dump.

I relayed this somewhat surprising answer back to Linda at CCI. She responded, "They are correct that the primers will be active again once they dry out and I am a bit surprised they will eventually be buried at the dump but I am sure they know what is best."

After all this, I conclude that the only effective way to make a primer inert is to fire it.

In all cases, of course, you should wear suitable eye and ear protection.

Then, if the primer is intact and already in an otherwise empty shell, fire it (in a safe direction).

If it is loose, one person said they hit them with a hammer (one at a time). But note that one primer is comparable to an M-80 firecracker which can do considerable damage: one primer is decidedly more powerful than hitting toy gun caps one at a time, or even a whole role of caps all at once. Fun maybe but safe?

I also found a report that primers can also be "cooked off" on a hot plate with a cover or as another person reported, in a pressure cooker with a loose lid on the kitchen stove. [Oh yeah, my wife would like that, all right.]

Burning them in a fire where they go "Bang" and scatter live sparks is another questionable but occasionally reported approach to "deactivating" primers.

Regardless, the bottom line is that primers can't be deactivated. One way or another, you gotta make them go "Bang!"

Anything short of that and they are still dangerous, now or in the future.

About Me

Blog Archive

© Copyright 2004-2008 by Ed Skinner, All Rights Reserved.